🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with public health regulations. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “following international suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator commented: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.