I'm a Hardcore Capitalist, But Medicare for All Is the Optimal Hope for American Healthcare

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many federal military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.

Curtis Hart
Curtis Hart

A tech enthusiast and digital strategist with over a decade of experience in software development and innovation consulting.